Re:Borgs are giant extrachromosomal elements
by derefr on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @01:09AM
(#27817781)
What do those organisms have in common that made them good model organisms that researchers favoured studying? Perhaps one of those same properties (fast reproductive rate, maybe?) requires ditching the vault complex.
Plausible. Makes one wonder what else we haven't figured out because of the same bias.
Re:Borgs are giant extrachromosomal elements
by meroes on Saturday July 17, 2021 @08:12PM
(#27869797)
Arabidopsis thaliana is at least interesting because it tells time https://youtu.be/CA-YsWXRSHU?t=418
Re:Borgs are giant extrachromosomal elements
by patcon on Saturday July 17, 2021 @02:12PM
(#27867610)
Really insightful comment. Thanks!
Re:Borgs are giant extrachromosomal elements
by amelius on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @06:31AM
(#27819395)
> Wow. As if some hacker is playing against the researchers, removing the backdoor from all the most studied systems.
Or perhaps it simply explains why it took so long to find them.
Re:Borgs are giant extrachromosomal elements
by inciampati on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @06:15AM
(#27819276)
It's possible, although the cited articles in that section are from 1990 and 1991. (Another one links to a clone of the same wikipedia article in pfam, which is a comically circular reference.) We hadn't sequenced much then, so the absence of these organelles was probably established by microscopy in these model organisms.
Arabidopsis thaliana
Caenorhabditis elegans
Drosophila melanogaster
Saccharomyces cerevisiae"
Wow. As if some hacker is playing against the researchers, removing the backdoor from all the most studied systems.