News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An Alfvenic reconnecting plasmoid thruster by petschge on Monday July 12, 2021 @09:57PM (#27816990)
Keep in mind that most of that comes from MHD simulation and MHD simulation are well known in the community to get details of reconnection quite wrong [1]. So until somebody has confirmed that with particle-in-cell simulations, hybrid simulations with a good Ohms law or an experimental device, take all performance numbers with a big grain of salt.

Oh an another thing: Very high velocity exhaust gives you large I_sp, so good efficiency in the use of the working gas that you are exhausting to get delta-v. But high exhaust velocity also implies that you need A LOT of (electrical) energy to do that. (Since power requirements scale as P = 0.5 * m/dt * v_ex^2, but thrust only goes up linearly, i.e. F = m/dt * v_ex.)

[1] See figure 1 in https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/1999JA90...

Re:An Alfvenic reconnecting plasmoid thruster by regularfry on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @02:40AM (#27818176)
Thanks, I was a bit surprised to see reconnection just being assumed to be a reliable design component and wondered what bit of news I'd missed.
Re:An Alfvenic reconnecting plasmoid thruster by deviledeggs on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @04:43AM (#27818768)
I never knew that about exhaust velocity. So as propellant mass efficiency goes up linearly, power use goes up exponentially? does that make fast interstellar travel impossible?
Re:An Alfvenic reconnecting plasmoid thruster by petschge on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @10:19AM (#27821298)
Not exponentially. That would be exp(v). But quadratically, which is faster than linear. I would really hope that at least here people would know that exponentially names a particular function and is not a synonym for "fast".