How The Chronicle is trying to malign Sci-Hub

Re:How The Chronicle is trying to malign Sci-Hub by uniqueid on Friday July 09, 2021 @06:19AM (#27782218)

I have a superstition: I don't see a robust future for Sci-Hub, Internet Archive or Wikipedia. The internet relentlessly turns everything into worthless trash, so Sci-Hub will die, Internet Archive will wind up with Doritos ads and a paywall, and Wikipedia will focus on sponsored articles and deprecate, in one way or another, articles that aren't commercial.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How The Chronicle is trying to malign Sci-Hub by worik on Friday July 09, 2021 @07:50AM (#27782717)

What is your time frame for this?

Internet Archive has been around since 1996 and Wikipedia 2001 (ish)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How The Chronicle is trying to malign Sci-Hub by uniqueid on Friday July 09, 2021 @08:51AM (#27783171)

I don't have a time frame for it. I just know that 'this is useful' historically doesn't save an online service (Napster, Ebay, Amazon, Reddit, Twitter, Google Search, etc) from disappearing or turning lousy. The fact that millions of people love Internet Archive and Wikipedia means there's money to made by ruining them.

[ Parent | on HN ]