Re:What really happened to Jack Ma?
by Aunche on Wednesday July 07, 2021 @11:45AM
(#27762393)
There are plenty of comments critical of the CCP like half the comments here. The difference is that they are actually relevant to the article, which has very little to do with Xi and has even less to do international law. This is probably why dang interpreted as flamebait.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What really happened to Jack Ma?
by rorykoehler on Wednesday July 07, 2021 @12:40PM
(#27763060)
First let me say I think dang does an exceptional job (far better than I could) in moderating this site and I am very grateful for it. Anytime I have fallen on the wrong side of the rules dang has been very fair and patient.
I don't disagree with your comment however none of the rules dang mentioned were actually broken. I read through the link and it only raised more questions. As I see it either the rules need to be updated or an official announcement from YC stating their position on this ever returning topic will put this to bed.
Eschew flamebait. Avoid unrelated controversies and generic tangents.