Re:UC Berkeley: Cellphone radiation is harmful, but few want...
by ihunter2839 on Wednesday July 07, 2021 @12:43AM
(#27757454)
During my rather short stint in a synthetic chemistry lab in college, I learned that it was a relatively standard practice for folks to "nuke" their reactions in a microwave in an attempt to speed things up. Certainly, nobody wanted anything to get ionized in these situations... So, to me the idea that biological systems may be able to pick up additional energy from local RF fields, and that this increase could potentially have adverse side effects, does not seem totally implausible.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:UC Berkeley: Cellphone radiation is harmful, but few want...
by deepserket on Wednesday July 07, 2021 @01:12AM
(#27757633)
By "nuke their reactions" you mean heating things up... Usually when there is more heat chemical reactions are faster (higher energy means higher chances for the right stuff to bump into each other)
Re:UC Berkeley: Cellphone radiation is harmful, but few want...
by ihunter2839 on Wednesday July 07, 2021 @06:27PM
(#27766464)
Well, yes and no. If they just wanted to heat things up, they'd throw the reaction over a Bunsen burner or some other appropriate heating element. So while I agree that the reactions are speeding up due to an increase in available energy, I'm hesitant to say it's the same as simply "heating things up".
Re:UC Berkeley: Cellphone radiation is harmful, but few want...
by swiley on Wednesday July 07, 2021 @05:44AM
(#27759228)
Thermal cycling is a big part of PCR. My understanding is that the cycle length is related to the length of the DNA/RNA you want to amplify.
At some point there's just so much noise you'll probably find carcinogens everywhere.