News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cryptocurrency Blockchains Don’t Need to Be Energy Intensive by DennisP on Monday July 05, 2021 @11:11AM (#27738766)
The same thing happens in PoW networks. You have to wait several blocks to gain confidence that a transaction won't be reverted.

In Ethereum's PoS, by waiting a similar amount of time you actually get finality; at that point your transaction cannot be reverted without a third of total stake being destroyed.

Re:Cryptocurrency Blockchains Don’t Need to Be Energy Intensive by sparkie on Monday July 05, 2021 @01:00PM (#27739841)
Unless Vitalik proposes a rollback.
Re:Cryptocurrency Blockchains Don’t Need to Be Energy Intensive by DennisP on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @12:24PM (#27750656)
And gets support for that rollback from a large majority of the community.

Given that level of community support, the same could happen in any PoW network.