Re:Cryptocurrency Blockchains Don’t Need to Be Energy Intensive
by DennisP on Monday July 05, 2021 @11:11AM
(#27738766)
The same thing happens in PoW networks. You have to wait several blocks to gain confidence that a transaction won't be reverted.
In Ethereum's PoS, by waiting a similar amount of time you actually get finality; at that point your transaction cannot be reverted without a third of total stake being destroyed.
Re:Cryptocurrency Blockchains Don’t Need to Be Energy Intensive
by sparkie on Monday July 05, 2021 @01:00PM
(#27739841)
Unless Vitalik proposes a rollback.
One second before Alice "confirms" my transaction, I can send out my transaction to Bob. Since my message takes time to propagate through the network, it won't reach Alice soon enough and she will think I've paid her, and she'll send me whatever I was paying for. But other people will see both these transactions within t seconds of each other. They won't know which they should believe is correct, and they might not accept payment from Alice in the future.