News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Git vs. Fossil: what you should have done vs. what you did. Parent comment

Re:Git vs. Fossil: what you should have done vs. what you did by wojciechpolak on Monday July 05, 2021 @10:28AM (#27738348)
Because: "Fossil, in contrast, puts more emphasis on recording exactly what happened, including all of the messy errors..."
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Git vs. Fossil: what you should have done vs. what you did by mpweiher on Monday July 05, 2021 @10:34AM (#27738405)
Logical errors, dead-ends.

You don't commit when the tests fail.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Git vs. Fossil: what you should have done vs. what you did by Cthulhu_ on Monday July 05, 2021 @10:41AM (#27738473)
Shouldn't, and shouldn't be able to (git pre-commit hook), but some people don't have that, some people use git as cmd+s.
[ Parent | on HN ]