Re:Is Alexandra Elbakyan in real trouble this time?
by smt88 on Sunday July 04, 2021 @06:19PM
(#27733095)
This would be wonderfully altruistic, but it would be career suicide as well.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Is Alexandra Elbakyan in real trouble this time?
by enriquto on Sunday July 04, 2021 @06:37PM
(#27733187)
This is simply not true. The world has changed a lot the last 10 years. In many scientific fields, you are actually expected to publish your "preprint" in the open and also your source code.
Re:Is Alexandra Elbakyan in real trouble this time?
by 542458 on Sunday July 04, 2021 @07:11PM
(#27733365)
In what fields are you expected to publish your source code? In the fields I’ve interacted with it was always an “above and beyond” thing that nobody would raise an eye at you not doing.
Re:Is Alexandra Elbakyan in real trouble this time?
by enriquto on Sunday July 04, 2021 @07:19PM
(#27733411)
i was thinking about image processing or machine learning, but i'm sure this is the case in other fields as well. Reproducible research is a "hot topic" in many places, and for good reasons.
Re:Is Alexandra Elbakyan in real trouble this time?
by ta988 on Sunday July 04, 2021 @09:23PM
(#27733938)
ecology, more and more biology, chemistry...
Re:Is Alexandra Elbakyan in real trouble this time?
by smt88 on Sunday July 04, 2021 @10:43PM
(#27734235)
That's not at all the same as the proposal I was replying to.
They seemed to be saying that people should only publish in Sci-Hub, making it a prestigious publication (that would appear in press releases, one assumes) instead of just a mirror.