Re:Study That Impregnated Male Rats Stirs Controversy
by goatlover on Sunday July 04, 2021 @02:35AM
(#27727682)
Why would that reasoning apply only to certain animals and not others? If it's okay to be cruel to rats for the service of the greater good, then why not dogs, apes or dolphins? Why not humans? Where and how do you draw the line?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Study That Impregnated Male Rats Stirs Controversy
by throwaway675309 on Sunday July 04, 2021 @03:57PM
(#27732160)
I'm not going to defend this study, but we already have a line between humans and nonhumans, particularly when legally speaking. For example, the sentences handed down for killing another human are far more severe than killing an animal. These lines already exist.
Re:Study That Impregnated Male Rats Stirs Controversy
by cm2187 on Sunday July 04, 2021 @02:51AM
(#27727755)
Well there is a line. I don't think twice using insecticide when confronted to a mosquito.
Re:Study That Impregnated Male Rats Stirs Controversy
by paopoi on Sunday July 04, 2021 @04:30AM
(#27728126)
Killing a mosquito is an act of self preservation, as valid now as it was 10.000 years ago.
Many of us live an existence pretty removed from the threats of the wild, but we we’re not totally detached from the need to “protect” ourselves. :)