Re:Google+, or how 120+ people wrote a book at the same time
by sp332 on Saturday July 16, 2011 @09:34PM
(#2772260)
You're barely even offensive, you're just a waste of space. You have an inflated sense of how strongly people feel about your comments. I'm only voting you down because you're noise in my conversation.
Re:Google+, or how 120+ people wrote a book at the same time
by Dylan16807 on Saturday July 16, 2011 @08:51PM
(#2772210)
What the heck are you ranting about? You got downvoted for making a joke that wasn't very contributive.
Re:Google+, or how 120+ people wrote a book at the same time
by ThaddeusQuay on Saturday July 16, 2011 @09:03PM
(#2772219)
I also considered that possibility, but since I don't know the real reason why, and you don't either, I figured I'd go with the more sensational response, especially since the comment to which I responded was also not "very contributive", yet did not get downvoted.
Re:Google+, or how 120+ people wrote a book at the same time
by icebraining on Saturday July 16, 2011 @09:24PM
(#2772247)
He was referring to Brooks' law, so he was making a comment about the project. Your post was completely offtopic.
And by the way, your post being downvoted wasn't ironic at all.
It's somewhat ironic that I'm being downvoted on a simple response to a comment on an article about GooglePlus, the same service which was reported, on the same day, to have banned certain people for saying certain things. I better stop, before I get banned from here, or rendered invisible, because I don't want to have to join the ranks of Anonymous ... just yet.