Re:Target finally explains why nearly all its SF stores have...
by rdtwo on Saturday July 03, 2021 @05:06PM
(#27724921)
A lot of these pharmacy stores are setup such that the checkout is offset from the entrance/exit probably because most of the money comes from the pharmacy. It also means that shoplifters just go straight out carrying whatever they can grab and at least in my area they aren’t even trying to be discrete
Re:Target finally explains why nearly all its SF stores have...
by HWR_14 on Sunday July 04, 2021 @02:56AM
(#27727780)
Then why don't the stores just hire people to stop them?
Re:Target finally explains why nearly all its SF stores have...
by sbierwagen on Monday July 05, 2021 @01:37AM
(#27734911)
Stop them from doing what? The police won't prosecute. Security guards are private citizens and do not have an unlimited right to just grab other people and detain them. If the stolen goods are inside, say, a backpack, they also do not have the ability to search that backpack.
You can only have security guards if the state backs them up. The state is not backing them up.
Re:Target finally explains why nearly all its SF stores have...
by HWR_14 on Monday July 05, 2021 @01:15PM
(#27739946)
> Stop them from doing what?
Leaving with things they did not pay for.
> Security guards ... do not have an unlimited right to just grab other people and detain them. If the stolen goods are inside, say, a backpack, they also do not have the ability to search that backpack.
Not unlimited rights. They can use reasonable (and solely nonlethal) force to detain shoplifters that they have probable cause are shoplifting and even search them (for instance, their backpacks) for such goods. You need to read up on California Penal Code 490.5.
They cannot punish them, but they can prevent them from leaving with items they don't own.
This article also points out that Walgreens has not curtailed their hours. And if it's so bad, why wouldn't Target just hire more security personnel?