News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:RateOurCops – Like Yelp, but for Cops by dvt on Friday July 02, 2021 @05:14PM (#27716962)
> not post videos of cops, which is unconstitutional

Just to be clear, you're not allowed to post videos of plenty of things (Area-51, a meeting between the Joint Chiefs, closed sessions in Congress, etc.). But you're right that you're allowed to record videos of cops in public[1]. I think the law in question is about personally-identifiable information.

[1] https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-1st-circuit/1578557.html

Re:RateOurCops – Like Yelp, but for Cops by perihelions on Friday July 02, 2021 @05:24PM (#27717072)
It's perfectly legal to post videos of any of those things.
Re:RateOurCops – Like Yelp, but for Cops by munk-a on Friday July 02, 2021 @05:53PM (#27717402)
It is illegal to post a whole lot of videos you might find pretty innocuous. A not insignificant portion of America has two party consent laws[1] that really restrict what you're able to record when it comes to private individuals. It has been pretty clearly decided highlighted that police do not enjoy this commonly held right[2] due to the sensitivity of their role but I really don't know if that same restriction extends to other public offices when acting in a non-public manner (i.e. the JCS) - I am really not familiar with the specific exceptions the above comment laid out so I won't comment on them... but it is illegal to post a whole bunch of different sorts of videos.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_call_recording_laws#...

2. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/06/you-have-first-amendme...

Re:RateOurCops – Like Yelp, but for Cops by ashtonkem on Friday July 02, 2021 @06:43PM (#27717802)
It’s illegal to record without consent in some states. Posting such a recording is problematic because it’s evidence of a crime, not a crime in and of itself. If it were, there would be cases of journalists posting transcripts from illegally recorded conversations, which isn’t happening.