> this is the opposite of Jobs philosophy

I would caution you about pigeon-holing "Jobs' philosophy". I have observed that his philosophy often suited the circumstances he found himself in at various points in his fascinating career. ;-)

> this is the opposite of Jobs philosophy.

Frankly, I think that the design changes Apple has been making are very much in line with how Jobs would have done things.

Would he have made it exactly the same? No, certainly not; he was a different person who was very opinionated, so there would be differences—but the direction of the changes would, I think, be very similar.

However, I think it's also pretty irrelevant, given that Jobs himself explicitly said "Don't try to do things the way I would do them. Just do the right things." (Paraphrased from memory.)

May be you are right. My understanding of Jobs way of thinking is "product/user" first. In the context of a Desktop user interaction is not touch oriented. User interface must give options with minimal cognitive overload. Translating iOS to Desktop is serving only the vertical integration of Apple. Implementation is everything. I don't have any doubt that under Jobs the results of this process would be better.

>Just do the right things.

And that is exactly what they did. The right thing they ( Tim Cook ) thought was to extract as much money from their product line and user.

> The big problem was to move away from Logic, but where there's a will, there's a way.

I moved to Ableton years ago because I wanted a cross-platform DAW.

My workflow these days is to use WSL2 for everything. It even handles CUDA now