News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The short tale of an online scam by elliekelly on Thursday July 01, 2021 @11:23AM (#27700038)
> one designer I know calls it a debugging tool that should never have been released in the first place

I've heard similar comments but I don't understand how people would be expected to navigate around the internet? Is the idea that Google's search input should replace it? So if I want to go to sec.gov I should search SEC and click the link (hopefully) provided at the top of the results rather than just go there directly? It just doesn't make sense to me.

Re:The short tale of an online scam by teddyh on Thursday July 01, 2021 @05:25PM (#27705073)
In my limited experience, most browsers do what you describe already. Unless you type a 100% correct URL (and sometimes even if you do), a normal browser will send your URL string to Google (or similar entity), who will send back a redirect. The process is fast enought for you not to notice.

It is often possible (if hard) to configure browsers to do traditional URL resolving, but I wouldn’t bet on it always being possible. Google certainly has every reason to disallow reconfiguring their own browser to not send data to Google.

Re:The short tale of an online scam by chrismcb on Friday July 02, 2021 @12:51AM (#27707909)
The url you type is 100% correct. Sure, maybe you made a typo, but the browser didn't know that. It isn't sending your url to Google and waiting for a redirect. A redirect to what? A different url?
Re:The short tale of an online scam by teddyh on Friday July 02, 2021 @08:21AM (#27710512)
No, a redirect to the correct URL, the URL you typed, or meant to type.