News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Note that I wouldn’t pass the listed minimum requirements by LeifCarrotson on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @12:08PM (#27690238)
My conclusions remains that a nuanced flexibility between honesty and fraud is advantageous for competitive job seekers.

I'm aware that the world isn't black and white, someone who submits a truthful resume to a job posting where they don't technically meet the qualifications has only made a little white lie that's almost universally forgiven, you're correct that they'll likely look ambitious and confident if they tell the interviewer "if you want to be super technical about it I don't meet this one little qualification but I think you should ignore that because factors X and Y make me a great candidate".

It's this culture of pervasive little white lies which is harmful. Be brutally correct, not just sufficiently honest to brush off these occasional inconsistencies. When someone does make a little white lie, call them on the lie and take the mandated action. Otherwise people who are most flexible with what's acceptable will advance more than those who require correctness.

Re:Note that I wouldn’t pass the listed minimum requirements by phaemon on Wednesday June 30, 2021 @12:55PM (#27690792)
> someone who submits a truthful resume to a job posting where they don't technically meet the qualifications has only made a little white lie

They haven't lied at all. Where is the lie in saying, "I don't meet your requirements but I think you should hire me anyway"?