News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ohio GOP ends attempt to ban municipal broadband after pr... by Jtsummers on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @06:04PM (#27682361)
Outside of major urban areas, there is often no bullying required. It was not economical 20+ years ago for there to be more than one physical cable or telephone provider in an area. Moving away from dial-up and DSL (which sit on top of phone lines which anyone can buy access to) toward cable (and fiber in the past decade) has put the power on the cable companies who physically own and maintain the lines. Since, in contrast to phones, cable has not typically sold access other than direct-to-customer, they maintain that same model. They don't sell access for someone who buys a fast fiber connection to then connect to the cable network and then their cable customers "dial into" that person's box. Instead, you only get service through the cable company itself.

Because cable requires a massive financial outlay, we end up with regional monopolies unless cable companies are forced to open up their physical platform to others. Which is rare.

Re:Ohio GOP ends attempt to ban municipal broadband after pr... by throwawayboise on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @07:32PM (#27683126)
" It was not economical 20+ years ago for there to be more than one physical cable or telephone provider in an area. "

It was(is) more than that. Those companies were granted a franchise/local monopoly on providing the service. By law, nobody could compete with them, whether it was economically possible or not.

Re:Ohio GOP ends attempt to ban municipal broadband after pr... by dominotw on Thursday July 01, 2021 @10:56AM (#27699648)
> By law, nobody could compete with them, whether it was economically possible or not.

Why not just fix that law now though. OP is stating that it is a profitable business. If they fix that law wouldn't there be new entrants, fixing original problem.