Re:MIT and Harvard agree to transfer edX to ed-tech firm 2U
by benrbray on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @09:44AM
(#27675673)
It's not really catering to disable a feature. You can call it "audit" mode and offer no credential.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:MIT and Harvard agree to transfer edX to ed-tech firm 2U
by jhbadger on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @02:25PM
(#27679780)
The problem with "audit" mode is that it is more than just not getting a credential (which I like most people who already have their educations don't need) but that often you can't take the online exams either. I still want to know if I've learned the material properly!
Re:MIT and Harvard agree to transfer edX to ed-tech firm 2U
by ncallaway on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @10:45AM
(#27676540)
Sure they could do that. You're essentially asking them to implement an additional feature to handle a new use case—a totally reasonable thing to ask.
But it seems like it's really a stretch to say "it's a dark pattern to not implement this feature that covers my use case". If not implementing a desired feature is a "dark pattern", then I'm not really sure I know what constitutes a dark pattern