Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might be worse

Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by nzmsv on Monday June 28, 2021 @12:27PM (#27663952)

And there are others who, when faced with the trade-off, would choose differently.

It's amusing how on another thread the general consensus may be a celebration of Let's Encrypt while over here I seem to come off as crazy (and thus deserving of downvotes simply for saying "not everyone agrees with you").

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by bruce343434 on Monday June 28, 2021 @01:26PM (#27664729)

You are probably receiving downvotes because you're making a non sequitur. The web is, unlike phonelines, encrypted. At best it's a strawman or just a false equivalence.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by nzmsv on Monday June 28, 2021 @07:38PM (#27669753)

Interesting! I see communication as communication, and the medium as completely separate. Does it really matter that much if I communicate an idea to another mind using squiggles on paper, dots on a screen, or recordings of sound waves?

[ Parent | on HN ]