Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might be worse

Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by Lio on Monday June 28, 2021 @12:21PM (#27663867)

Actually I'd quite like it if my government could block foreign phone calls that attempt to spoof local numbers.

If only as a way of stopping foreign criminal gangs from scamming the vulnerable.

The main reason this can't happen is because of international agreements that were made long before the internet age or this type of crime became a thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by nzmsv on Monday June 28, 2021 @12:27PM (#27663952)

And there are others who, when faced with the trade-off, would choose differently.

It's amusing how on another thread the general consensus may be a celebration of Let's Encrypt while over here I seem to come off as crazy (and thus deserving of downvotes simply for saying "not everyone agrees with you").

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by bruce343434 on Monday June 28, 2021 @01:26PM (#27664729)

You are probably receiving downvotes because you're making a non sequitur. The web is, unlike phonelines, encrypted. At best it's a strawman or just a false equivalence.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google no longer requires AMP, but the replacement might ... by nzmsv on Monday June 28, 2021 @07:38PM (#27669753)

Interesting! I see communication as communication, and the medium as completely separate. Does it really matter that much if I communicate an idea to another mind using squiggles on paper, dots on a screen, or recordings of sound waves?

[ Parent | on HN ]