Those are popular and accessible, the actual studies you can find through Google Scholar, SciHub or various medical publications.
This is not something where the general public - or software developers, who seem to treat cancer as a bug that needs to be fixed - are going to be very helpful, I am more than happy to trust the medical establishment with this.
What would be a game changer would be rather than improved testing something that would destroy tumors in-situ in a non-invasive manner that does not involve radiation or attempts to poison the body just this side of death.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK223933/
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/may/12/annual-scree...
Those are popular and accessible, the actual studies you can find through Google Scholar, SciHub or various medical publications.
This is not something where the general public - or software developers, who seem to treat cancer as a bug that needs to be fixed - are going to be very helpful, I am more than happy to trust the medical establishment with this.
What would be a game changer would be rather than improved testing something that would destroy tumors in-situ in a non-invasive manner that does not involve radiation or attempts to poison the body just this side of death.