So now there is a quasi-aristocracy running plays and putting on these electoral shows every couple of years.
Calls for substantial reform.
Technical people understand the need for clean architecture and political systems.
Humans are not code, but our political- and tax systems are a Byzantine train wreck. On a good day.
But go ahead and worry about DeMint's opinions, boss.
I submit that perhaps the communication challenge may be rooted in the modern insistence in making ansolutely everything political.
A Federalist construct would seek to assign appropriate tasking to each level of government, and have DC manage international and inter-State concerns.
Arguably, a single, monolithic state try to manage every personal and local concern leads to gridlock, Q.E.D.
The Convention of States is a campaign by the Tea Party movement to form an Article V convention, but they are more likely to present a balanced budget amendment, not electoral reform. Key people involved like Jim DeMint have also advocated for a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage—a pretty silly idea if you ask me.