Re:Why is AI hard and physics simple?
by Cederfjard on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @04:47PM
(#27596985)
I think MINT is the German version of STEM.
Yeah it is. Sorry that a germanism slipped.
"But deriving it"
It was a while back but I think we derived it in school aged 16-17 in first year A level Physics (UK.) Is that roughly "junior year in college" elsewhere?
As I recall, deriving it required a solid grasp of special relativity and calculus. I mean, if you want to say that you did that at 16, I won't argue with you. But if you claim all students did that it seems unlikely.
Edit: Oxford University, since you are from the UK and that's reputable within the country, lists General Relativity (and hence E=MC^2's derivation) as a 3rd year course in the Physics program. So that makes it squarely in the junior year.
E=mc^2 is a result from special relativity. This is usually touched on earlier than general relativity.
Ah, thank you. It's been a while since I had to remember which was which.
And e=mc^2 is not a simple formula. Okay, it's simple. But deriving it and understanding why it's like that was what, junior year in college?