And the higher the position, the worse it is [2].
[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/victorlipman/2013/04/25/the-dis... [2] https://www.forbes.com/sites/stephaniesarkis/2019/10/27/seni...
The person is doing the damage to themselves, not to others (in their own mind, which neither of us can really enter). This isn't a prison experiment.
Bonus, I don't think the parent comment was trying to represent his friend's actions as something to replicate.
Fair point. I didn't intend to counter OP, but a general sentiment in tech. Could have made it clearer.
> The person is doing the damage to themselves, not to others
Actually we don't know that. Tech is usually a collaborative field. And the line between auto-exploitation and allo-exploitation is often blurry. The very least through not taking care of oneself in a balanced fashion they've distributed that cost to the insurance payers, their family and even their team through their absence. The word individual means indivisible, not isolated.
I'll be blunt, I am not worried about your friend's mental health as much as I am worried about them being a person who will not refuse being part of an operation despite being hospitalized for it. I am scared of the possibility that they could be made to do anything as long as they are paid enough. I am worried that a person that makes such a decision might be a manager, a parent or otherwise influential. There is absolutely nothing to be valorized about this.