Re:We Can't Let People Work from Home, for Stupid Reasons
by tablespoonsruby on Monday June 21, 2021 @07:06PM
(#27585706)
> I don't think it'd be too much of a stretch to also suggest that it'd be bad if all employers decided that their workers had to be butts-in-seats 40 hours (or more) per week, no exceptions.
Well, yes. That's not happening, though. My point is that I see people essentially claiming that it's immoral for any companies to not permit remote work, and I disagree with that.
Re:We Can't Let People Work from Home, for Stupid Reasons
by tolbish on Monday June 21, 2021 @07:23PM
(#27585863)
What is the difference between mandated butts in seats for 40 hours and not permitting remote work?
Re:We Can't Let People Work from Home, for Stupid Reasons
by tablespoonsruby on Monday June 21, 2021 @07:49PM
(#27586082)
Nothing. There's a difference between all employers forbidding remote work, and only some of them doing so.
I think we can agree that if every software company decided that they were going to be a full-time pairing shop, that'd be a bad thing. In the same way, I don't think it'd be too much of a stretch to also suggest that it'd be bad if all employers decided that their workers had to be butts-in-seats 40 hours (or more) per week, no exceptions.