News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hire-to-fire at Amazon India? by varispeed on Sunday June 20, 2021 @01:46PM (#27572271)
The problem is that this is a "factory worker" mindset applied to creative and IP based work.

When a factory worker makes a chair, company does not profit from it indefinitely.

When a developer creates code he or she gets paid once, but company profits forever.

So even if they fire a developer, they still are profiting the from work they did. Question is, why developers sign IP transfer and royalty waiver in their contracts?

Re:Hire-to-fire at Amazon India? by visarga on Sunday June 20, 2021 @02:33PM (#27572700)
> When a developer creates code he or she gets paid once, but company profits forever.

Forever usually being 1-5 years?

Re:Hire-to-fire at Amazon India? by varispeed on Sunday June 20, 2021 @05:54PM (#27574249)
It's a figure of speech, but I've seen 10 year old commits still doing well in production and some written before even git was a thing.

Given how much value this work generates, it's time developers got together and put a pressure on companies to pay fairer and proportionally to profits they are generating.

I'd even opt for a legislation that would make contract clauses about giving up royalties illegal.