Re:North Carolina tells retired engineer he can't talk about...
by _nalply on Saturday June 19, 2021 @10:05AM
(#27560559)
Correct would be lex mala, lex nulla (omit one L).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:North Carolina tells retired engineer he can't talk about...
by Aeolun on Saturday June 19, 2021 @06:36PM
(#27565144)
This is weird. Even I can see that it seems to say nothing but:
Bad law, no law.
Does latin have an implied ‘better than’ in sequences?
Re:North Carolina tells retired engineer he can't talk about...
by blix on Saturday June 19, 2021 @07:16PM
(#27565434)
What's implied here is 'is', i.e. "a bad law is no law."
The phrase seems to be a rehash of a quote from St Augustine: "lex iniusta non est lex" meaning "an injust law is not a law", which is more clear.