Re:Starlink dishes go into “thermal shutdown” once they hit ...
by nine_k on Friday June 18, 2021 @11:22PM
(#27557459)
A few hundred thousand guys from less overheated areas might politely disagree.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Starlink dishes go into “thermal shutdown” once they hit ...
by sundvor on Saturday June 19, 2021 @05:09AM
(#27559025)
Yeah and with the data they gather, they might be able to work out geographically appropriate versions.
Eg add a smaller AIO water cooler to a hot climate area version, or some other hardening.
Maybe it makes sense to apply to all versions? Can't know until you have some data.
Sounds like a great and sensible beta program to me. Avoids premature optimisation, lets you see what actually goes wrong (where, and in what conditions) without a massive effort up front.
Re:Starlink dishes go into “thermal shutdown” once they hit ...
by ClumsyPilot on Saturday June 19, 2021 @07:34AM
(#27559645)
For fuck sakes people this is ambient temperature, it does not require beta testing, it requires someone to get off their ass and look at over a century of temperature data that organisations like nasa have been collecting.
I see people here hate the idea of startups or engineers being responsible for any kind of reliable service even though lives depend on it, and as this "SV spirit" infiltrates more of our life even coffee machines don't work without an internet connection, a subscribtion and software update.
Completely prosperous
Re:Starlink dishes go into “thermal shutdown” once they hit ...
by jrockway on Monday June 21, 2021 @01:47PM
(#27581628)
Why do you think the parts spec'd for this use case are available? The humble STM32 microcontroller has ONE YEAR lead times right now. If you're launching a hardware product right now, the supply chain dictates the design, not the other way around.
Re:Starlink dishes go into “thermal shutdown” once they hit ...
by jessaustin on Saturday June 19, 2021 @08:37AM
(#27559940)
prosperous
I think that's the idea...