> Perhaps they were providing asymmetric value to engineers, and at the end of the day the engineers are not the ones paying for the service
This is a very good insight. Unless candidates pay more than companies, the incentives are off.
This is a very good insight. Unless candidates pay more than companies, the incentives are off.
To be clear, I'm only addressing the comment about how people thinking highly of them are gullible. I had a great experience, twice, within a few months, and that included going through a time of huge uncertainty.
That being said, I was not happy to see each of the changes they've made over the last year or so, and this does not strike me a good direction for engineers. I suppose I have to agree that they are not doing this from a position of market leadership. Perhaps they were providing asymmetric value to engineers, and at the end of the day the engineers are not the ones paying for the service.