Re:1931: Kurt Gödel shows limits of math, logic, computing, AI
by erichahn on Thursday June 17, 2021 @07:46AM
(#27538539)
Which one? I don't think so tbh because his proof uses PA.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:1931: Kurt Gödel shows limits of math, logic, computing, AI
by ProfHewitt on Monday June 21, 2021 @10:50AM
(#27579713)
The reason that [Gödel 1931] was influential was that it
claimed to prove incompleteness for a system for the
foundations of mathematics.
1st-order systems such a PA were introduced later and
quickly shown to be inadequate for the foundations of mathematics.
Re:1931: Kurt Gödel shows limits of math, logic, computing, AI
by kyberias on Thursday June 17, 2021 @07:54AM
(#27538588)
It's very easy for you to check this from his 1931 article.
Re:1931: Kurt Gödel shows limits of math, logic, computing, AI
by ProfHewitt on Monday June 21, 2021 @10:51AM
(#27579729)
Yes, it is very easy to check that [Gödel 1931] was for a
system for the foundation of mathematics.
Re:1931: Kurt Gödel shows limits of math, logic, computing, AI
by erichahn on Thursday June 17, 2021 @08:16AM
(#27538768)
If you figure this out correctly you can claim the third incompleteness theorem. (If I am right)
Re:1931: Kurt Gödel shows limits of math, logic, computing, AI
by ProfHewitt on Monday June 21, 2021 @12:00PM
(#27580448)
Results in [Gödel 1931] depend on existence of proposition
I'mUnprovable. Since, the proposition doesn't exist in
foundations, the results in [Gödel 1931] do not hold for foundations.