News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The mice that roared: how eight tiny countries took on fo... by ethbr0 on Wednesday June 16, 2021 @09:24AM (#27528255)
Having satellite coverage, especially wide field-of-view naval reconnaissance types, would seem more valuable than brute force and numbers.

Especially since I believe fishing fleets have centralized utility boats? Impound a processing & refrigeration ship... and what's the rest of the fleet going to do?

[Edit] US example: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Ocean_Surveillance_Sys...

Also, apparently the ex-Soviet radar version with the brilliant idea of boosting their nuclear reactors into a higher orbit at EOL: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/US-A

Re:The mice that roared: how eight tiny countries took on fo... by sithadmin on Wednesday June 16, 2021 @11:17AM (#27529478)
Fishing fleet support vessels and factory/processing ships tend to stay in international waters, outside the reach of any particular nation's coast guard or naval forces. Many such vessels rarely, if ever, visit a port to avoid actions like boarding and seizure. And when they do, they try to dock at a port in a jurisdiction that's unlikely (or expressly made it clear) they aren't going to take any sort of police action against the vessel and its crew.

While these vessels are out in international waters, one can't simply board/seize/sink such vessels without causing a major diplomatic incident with economic consequences at best. At worst, it would be perceived as an act of war and invite military response.