News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Myths in cycling: wider tires are slower by ultrarunner on Monday June 14, 2021 @06:08PM (#27508945)
I would argue that "designed for [off] road mix" is pretty charitable. A 500-pound dirt bike with a comfortable seating position wins the tough-aesthetics competition, but off road performance is meager at best. I built decent off-road skills on a DL1000, but the weight was always such a liability as to make it impracticable. I moved to a smaller and lighter bike and have more fun, but 99% of people I met in Arizona are happy with their big ADV bikes— with zero interest in going off road.

I think the most interesting take-away is that there is a segment of people who value being given an excuse for something rugged— I heard lots of "I just like the peace-of-mind that I could go anywhere if I needed to" whether they believe themselves or not.

Re:Myths in cycling: wider tires are slower by Sleepytime on Monday June 14, 2021 @09:21PM (#27510341)
Even on a street only trip I'd prefer an adventure bike to most street bikes, the rugged factor shouldn't be discounted when you're 1000+ miles away from home and outside of cell signal.
Re:Myths in cycling: wider tires are slower by stickfigure on Tuesday June 15, 2021 @01:17AM (#27511592)
You'd be surprised. I've taken my 500-pound dirt bike (KTM 990A) to the end of Baja (all dirt), across the Trans America Trail, and to Alaska and back. Did most of the hard splits on LA-Barstow-to-Vegas a few years ago, and endless dirt riding in the Sierras and Nevada. And I'm by no means the best rider I know.

Single track is hard work but there's nothing quite like ripping open the throttle on a 100hp dirt bike and throwing up a tornado of sand. I owned an XR250R for a few years and just found it boring.

Re:Myths in cycling: wider tires are slower by dharmab on Tuesday June 15, 2021 @02:37AM (#27512027)
To be fair the VStrom 1000 the commentor was riding is fairly heavy and street oriented. A KTM, Tenere or smaller GS blows it out of the water off road.
Re:Myths in cycling: wider tires are slower by ultrarunner on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @12:42AM (#27588056)
I've ridden with some others on big KTMs who struggle a lot more than the guys on the smaller bikes. I think once a certain weight threshold is crossed there's no argument that the bike is appropriately called an "off-road" bike, no matter how knobby the tires. Conversely, aesthetics are always in play. Especially for the GS guys at Starbucks ;)
Re:Myths in cycling: wider tires are slower by LAC-Tech on Monday June 14, 2021 @07:17PM (#27509593)
Well there's shades of grey between paved tarmac and proper off road.

Not a motorcyclists but I assume these adventure/dual sport bikes perform much better over say unsealed roads, and are at least workable on fire roads.

Re:Myths in cycling: wider tires are slower by dharmab on Monday June 14, 2021 @11:38PM (#27511012)
Fire roads are easy mode on an ADV bike. They can do double track quite well too. They start to struggle in mud, sand and single track.
Re:Myths in cycling: wider tires are slower by LAC-Tech on Tuesday June 15, 2021 @12:10AM (#27511188)
I'd presume that pure street motorcycles would fair pretty badly on even double track.

So yeah, ADV would seem to be useful for something other than wanting to look rugged.

Re:Myths in cycling: wider tires are slower by ultrarunner on Tuesday June 15, 2021 @02:09AM (#27511865)
This is exactly right. The contrast that piqued my interest was something like knobby tires on a heavy bike that spent its life on the street. Turns out people value comfort (here, seating position and long suspension travel), but those things only seem to sell with a rugged aesthetic. Balancing these needs is something of a Hard Problem, so it's interesting to watch this play out throughout the industry.
Re:Myths in cycling: wider tires are slower by tomgp on Tuesday June 15, 2021 @02:50AM (#27512138)
Totally, in London i regularly encounter cobbled streets, my big tyre gravel bike is perfect.