Legislation would unmask third-party sellers, but Amazon is fighting it

Re:Legislation would unmask third-party sellers, but Amazon ... by mech422 on Friday June 11, 2021 @10:33PM (#27480916)

I have hate for the post office because I get like 1 legitimate piece of mail a month, yet the post office is constantly stuffing those stupid supermarket flyers in my box with no opt-out.

So I got a PO Box...Aaaannnd of course the P.O. couldn't forward that 1 piece of mail properly :-p

so yeah - I find them useless and actively avoid any items that will be delivered by them (eg 'e-packet' stuff from aliexpress is a no go)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Legislation would unmask third-party sellers, but Amazon ... by technofiend on Saturday June 12, 2021 @07:22AM (#27483672)

Interesting. I literally never get flyers of any kind in my po box. I used to get them at home but opted out using the usual process.

Weirdly I have the opposite experience using foreign delivery services: my wife buys items from Japan regularly that come DHL and I've never lost one. But I don't use my po box to forward mail, just receive it.

https://faq.usps.com/s/article/Refuse-unwanted-mail-and-remo...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Legislation would unmask third-party sellers, but Amazon ... by mech422 on Saturday June 12, 2021 @06:46PM (#27488040)

Unless its changed - you can't refuse stuff addressed to 'occupant' like supermarket flyers. You can remove your _name_ from mailing lists, but that wasnt' my issue. So I got a 'PO Box' from a local ups store type place. Now I don't get junk mail.

Maybe the difference is due to my "PO Box" actually being at a store and not an actual Post Office? It's at a local ups store/mailboxes etc. type store, so the Post Office would actually have to forward the mail, not just drop it in a PO Box on premise.

[ Parent | on HN ]