Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living at home

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by strken on Friday June 11, 2021 @10:16PM (#27480816)

This is a bit too reductive. Men have a wider and flatter curve of outcomes than women. The ones who are doing really well are winning the Fields Medal and becoming C-suite executives; the ones who are struggling drop out of higher education, move back in with their parents, or get sent to jail.

A lot of the gender wars happen because what's true for Jeff Bezos is not true for the guy who spraypainted "Let Them Eat Fent[anyl]" around Civic Centre in SF, and the same traits that are rewarded in directed male CEOs are punished in directionless male fast food workers.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by wwweston on Saturday June 12, 2021 @01:32AM (#27481823)

This is one of the most interesting insights into gender divides, and years ago I think I recall seeing a link here on HN to an essay by someone who tied this insight into dynamics down to a cellular (ie sperm have a wider and flatter curve than eggs) and genetic level (men seem to have a higher incidence of both genetic defects and beneficial mutations).

I can't seem to find it again (much less speak to its accuracy). Does anyone have an idea what this might be?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by olalonde on Saturday June 12, 2021 @04:40AM (#27482815)

Edit: I believe you are referring to "Is There Anything Good About Men?": http://www.denisdutton.com/baumeister.htm. It was discussed multiple times on HN: https://hn.algolia.com/?q=Is+There+Anything+Good+About+Men%3...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by wwweston on Saturday June 12, 2021 @12:55PM (#27485721)

That's got to be it! Thanks.

[ Parent | on HN ]