News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Go 1.17 Beta by haolez on Thursday June 10, 2021 @04:45PM (#27465567)
One of Go's creator did a lot of the initial coding in Acme[0] :D

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acme_(text_editor)

Re:Go 1.17 Beta by ainar-g on Thursday June 10, 2021 @04:51PM (#27465665)
Something tells me that a person who reacts to Vim with a “yuck!” won't like Acme either. Also, I don't know how true this is, but I've read that Acme loses some of its advantages when it's run in e.g. X11 as opposed to its native rio[1] with plumber[2].

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_(windowing_system)

[2]: https://9fans.github.io/plan9port/man/man4/plumber.html

Re:Go 1.17 Beta by haolez on Thursday June 10, 2021 @05:05PM (#27465841)
I _think_ that Rob used Acme in OSX, but I can't find this source.
Re:Go 1.17 Beta by jd3 on Friday June 11, 2021 @10:13AM (#27473624)
Re:Go 1.17 Beta by spf13 on Friday June 11, 2021 @03:34PM (#27477510)
A couple of the Go authors did a lot of the initial coding and continue to code in Acme (rsc, r). The broader Go team use a wider variety: Vim, Emacs, Goland, and VSCode are the most popular from what I've seen.
Re:Go 1.17 Beta by pjmlp on Friday June 11, 2021 @01:28AM (#27469639)
Well, he is also the author, and ACME is even worse than classical VI, in terms of usability.

The only thing it has going for it is being based on Oberon's UI workflows.

Re:Go 1.17 Beta by bear8642 on Friday June 11, 2021 @09:40AM (#27473163)
Could you expand this? Quite like Acme and wondered what you don't like about it
Re:Go 1.17 Beta by pjmlp on Friday June 11, 2021 @10:20AM (#27473724)
Lack of syntax highlighting for one, not being even half as powerfull as Emacs as second.