News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by dheera on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @06:58PM (#27454434)
A big problem with hybrid is that you're forced to live in the same locality as the office, and most companies aren't subsidizing rent, but at the same time you need a decent office setup at home to be effective and that isn't cheap.

I moved apartments (from a studio to a 1-bedroom) at the start of COVID because it was basically impossible to work out of my bay area studio for a full day. I didn't even have a desk, because prior to COVID I basically only used it to sleep and rest, not work. I got a good rent price on the 1-bedroom because of COVID, but rental prices are going back up already.

Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by ryandrake on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @07:08PM (#27454540)
My worry is: let’s say my employer finally gives in and lets me work full time remote. Great! I can finally move to the Nevada desert or somewhere with low cost of living. I will likely take a modest salary reduction. Still wonderful! What happens 3 years later when there is new leadership or something and they pull a Marissa Mayer and declare remote work “bad” again, and recalls everyone to the headquarters? Now I’m fucked. I need to move back to the Bay Area after 3 years of housing price inflation! It’ll never work out. I fear once I leave I’m never coming back if the company changes it’s mind about remote work.
Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by ipaddr on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @07:45PM (#27454909)
If Marissa is in charge you will be looking for new work soon enough regardless if they move.
Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by dheera on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @07:15PM (#27454611)
Get the job from the bay area and then move.

Once you have the job, you're a black box that takes inputs and spits out work outputs in return for a monthly payment, and the company doesn't need to care where you actually are doing the work, as long as the black box works to specs (the JD).

Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by steelframe on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @09:40PM (#27455768)
> Get the job from the bay area and then move.

What’s to keep you from getting a job that’s ostensibly in Washington state and then moving to California? I believe that’s called, “tax evasion.”

Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by d110af5ccf on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @11:36PM (#27456392)
The company might or might not need to pay taxes differently on its end.

On your end, you (the individual) are required to file an income tax return with the state you reside in. If you lie and say you are unemployed that's very obviously fraud.

Whether the company you work for is willing to deal with any extra tax paperwork that might be required if you relocate is of course an open question.

Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by dheera on Thursday June 10, 2021 @01:17AM (#27456926)
What is defined as relocating anyway? If you work out of a camper van can't you just file taxes in any state you fancy driving to?
Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by d110af5ccf on Thursday June 10, 2021 @03:37AM (#27457977)
No, there are residency laws in each state. I'm not sure what happens when they conflict. For example, camping for 1 month each year in WA isn't going to get you out of paying CA income taxes if you own a home there that you live in the other 11 months of the year.
Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by parafactual on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @10:31PM (#27456060)
Is that illegal?
Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by Rapzid on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @08:15PM (#27455151)
> I will likely take a modest salary reduction

You might be surprised

> What happens 3 years later..

Find a new remote job? There were remote jobs before the pandemic; can't imagine they would all dry up.