Re:French set to replace English as EU’s ‘working language’
by mannerheim on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @03:27PM
(#27452040)
There are other, better-designed conlangs than Esperanto. Nobody speaks them, sure, but nobody speaks Esperanto either. And if we're going by popularity, might as well pick English anyway.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:French set to replace English as EU’s ‘working language’
by leke on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @04:25PM
(#27452739)
Esperanto has a pretty big, organised and active community.
But you're right. I also think popularity should be the decider. If Esperanto thinks it should be the chosen auxiliary language, it will have to earn it.
Personally though, I prefer Ido over Esperanto.
Re:French set to replace English as EU’s ‘working language’
by mnouquet on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @04:58PM
(#27453138)
Define "pretty big".
Re:French set to replace English as EU’s ‘working language’
by akvadrako on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @07:58PM
(#27455011)
Around year 2000 there were about 2 million speakers. It's way above any other conlang.
Re:French set to replace English as EU’s ‘working language’
by mannerheim on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @09:38PM
(#27455756)
That's akin to being the biggest fish in a fishbowl. There are minor dialects of minor languages with more speakers.
Re:French set to replace English as EU’s ‘working language’
by akvadrako on Thursday June 10, 2021 @04:03AM
(#27458176)
The question was about conlangs, which have the advantage of being designed to be easier to learn.
Esperanto is so easy it can be learned in negative time.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaedeutic_value_of_Espera....