No conferencing software that I'm aware of has solved the cocktail party effect. Since nobody can triangulate sounds properly, nobody can filter out side conversations or external noises. Everyone has to take turns to be understood, and if they don't, the guy with hearing aids doesn't get singled out by having to bring it up.
1. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Audio_A...
I think I'd at least want them all in the, say, central 160deg in front of me. At which point I wonder how good the 'spatialisation' is, how many people could be meaningfully supported.
Because you can't just have alternate speakers spaced out for maximal distinction - the same speaker suddenly coming from somewhere else would be even more jarring.
Really cool though.
Basically they use lasers and directional microphones. Seems like it could work for a conference call in a meeting room, but not sure how helpful it would be for a party.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US8286493
I'm more interested in the SRAY: a directional loudspeaker, which could avoid the need for so much ambient background noise. Also useful for alarm clocks, I suppose.
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/sray-world-s-smallest-dir...
A counter I employ to the cocktail-party effect is to pitch my voice very low. Sometimes the person I'm talking to picks up on this (consciously or not!) and imitates my low pitch. Despite others talking over us, it's easier to focus in on a lower pitch and let the brain filter out the noise.
But any interface where you can move a character in a world would be enough to make this work. It’s lovely because you can drop in and listen to a convo and walk away to another if you’d like.
I do believe there is a method to use this to give blind folks an ambient doppler tone from objects in their vicininity. I just don't have the chops or time to try it out.
It'd be neat if you could then encode the spatial information and use an HRTF on the destination receiver to appropriately place the sound in the listener's soundstage.
> A less drastic version of such processing is utilised by certain hearing aids, where high frequencies that are audible to normal-hearing subjects, but inaudible to those who are hearing-impaired, are shifted down to the audible range of the wearer. However, such an approach is problematic in terms of the preservation of directional cues, since the acoustic filtering effects due to the diffraction caused by the head and pinna vary substantially with frequency. Therefore, the directional cues delivered by the pitch-shifted signals do not carry the appropriate information related to the source direction that a human subject would have evolved and grown accustomed to.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-90829-9