Re:A walk in nature is better than microdosing
by ubercow13 on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @11:36AM
(#27436552)
London has lots of nice parks. There was much more greenery around me in London than there is in the ‘leafy’ suburb, elsewhere in the country, that I currently live in.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A walk in nature is better than microdosing
by 0xbadcafebee on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @12:01PM
(#27436915)
London is a bit of an outlier. It's high on the list of major cities with the most green space, at about 34%. It has more green space than any city in the UK, and it is the world's largest urban forest at over 8 million trees.
By comparison, Los Angeles is the only major US city with as much green space (the next is NYC at 27%), even though the US is 40 times bigger than the UK.
> and it is the world's largest urban forest at over 8 million trees.
According to this, Toronto has 10 million, and honestly I'm sort of surprised it's that low... do you have a source for the "largest" claim?
https://www.td.com/document/PDF/economics/special/UrbanFores...
Re:A walk in nature is better than microdosing
by nicoburns on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @04:04PM
(#27440054)
> It has more green space than any city in the UK
That's probably technically true, but a bit misleading. It's also pretty much the only city in the UK where it's difficult to get out into actual countryside. I used to live in Bristol and it certainly felt greener and more rural than London, even if it technically isn't.