News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A walk in nature is better than microdosing by hanniabu on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @11:29AM (#27436477)
I'd say because parks/nature is scarce in concrete cities
Re:A walk in nature is better than microdosing by ubercow13 on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @11:36AM (#27436552)
London has lots of nice parks. There was much more greenery around me in London than there is in the ‘leafy’ suburb, elsewhere in the country, that I currently live in.
Re:A walk in nature is better than microdosing by 0xbadcafebee on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @12:01PM (#27436915)
London is a bit of an outlier. It's high on the list of major cities with the most green space, at about 34%. It has more green space than any city in the UK, and it is the world's largest urban forest at over 8 million trees.

By comparison, Los Angeles is the only major US city with as much green space (the next is NYC at 27%), even though the US is 40 times bigger than the UK.

Re:A walk in nature is better than microdosing by gpm on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @12:31PM (#27437403)
> and it is the world's largest urban forest at over 8 million trees.

According to this, Toronto has 10 million, and honestly I'm sort of surprised it's that low... do you have a source for the "largest" claim?

https://www.td.com/document/PDF/economics/special/UrbanFores...

Re:A walk in nature is better than microdosing by nicoburns on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @04:04PM (#27440054)
> It has more green space than any city in the UK

That's probably technically true, but a bit misleading. It's also pretty much the only city in the UK where it's difficult to get out into actual countryside. I used to live in Bristol and it certainly felt greener and more rural than London, even if it technically isn't.

Re:A walk in nature is better than microdosing by standardUser on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @11:46AM (#27436696)
Agreed. The closest parks to me do not offer serene nature. They offer a diverse mix of people (and dogs) engaged in all kinds of different activities. It's entertaining and stimulating but I doubt it provides the benefits the author is talking about.

Especially since they keep mentioning forests and there is nothing remotely like a "forest" in walking distance from my home in NY. Nor was there was I lived in SF, and not even in the suburbs where I grew up.

Re:A walk in nature is better than microdosing by cogman10 on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @01:37PM (#27438316)
I live in Boise Idaho. While there are forests, none of them are within walking distance.

Having a forest in walking distance is a rarity.

Re:A walk in nature is better than microdosing by standardUser on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @04:41PM (#27440490)
True, but if you live near Presidio in SF or Prospect Park in Brooklyn (as examples) you can totally walk to a forest! And in many places where people own cars you and just drive 5 or 10 minutes. But clearly these circumstances are far from universal. Most people are lucky to have a half-decent park within a 10 minute walk.