This is the amendment you asked for: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/mar/16/china
Seriously?
The laws are only to promote production to increase the country's productive output. At any time the government can strip you of your property and redistribute it... which HAS happened numerous times already, without recourse, not appropriate compensation.
How can you possibly argue that faux property laws mean the country is not socialist??
The sooner the wider community accepts that China is a totalitarian regime with a long term communist agenda, the sooner we can stop allowing them to take advantage of the international community.
Property theft, land and sea right violation... corporate espionage. All are part of the official Chinese communist party aims.
> Yet China’s courts cannot invoke the constitution in rulings, so such a change will offer limited legal protection to peasants
https://www.cfr.org/blog/chinas-retrograde-rural-land-polici...
How China’s Legal System Enables Intellectual Property Theft
https://thediplomat.com/2020/11/how-chinas-legal-system-enab...
Human Rights Practices: China
https://www.state.gov/reports/2020-country-reports-on-human-...
>And READ the educational material before commenting!
Seems like a real condescending way to reply.
From the article:
> in July 2011 President Hu Jintao stressed that ‘China is still in the primary stage of socialism and will remain so for a long time to come’ (Xinhua, 2011)
China is very very interested in progressing the socialist and finally communist agenda. Believing otherwise is ignorance.
Show me the equivalent of the 5th amendment in Chinese law protecting private property rights. And please don’t forget... Chinese courts do not have the power of judicial review and cannot invalidate a statute on the grounds that it violates the constitution... ie China is a totalitarian system.
And READ the educational material before commenting!