Re:G7: Rich nations back deal to tax multinationals
by PragmaticPulp on Saturday June 05, 2021 @05:04PM
(#27408443)
> San Francisco is an interesting case cause they used to have a land tax
Property taxes on land aren't unique to San Francisco. It's basically standard practice in most cities to have one tax for property and one tax for improvements.
> Contrast that with New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Property owners had their buildings destroyed, so taxes went to zero (taxes based on the property value, not the land value)
New Orleans has separate property taxes on land and structures, so property taxes did not go to $0 after Katrina.
Overall property tax rates went up because income from taxes on structures went down, but unimproved lots still get a tax bill.
Re:G7: Rich nations back deal to tax multinationals
by gnopgnip on Saturday June 05, 2021 @09:16PM
(#27409879)
Are there any places outside of PA that do this in modern times?
Re:G7: Rich nations back deal to tax multinationals
by oblio on Saturday June 05, 2021 @01:01PM
(#27406690)
That's works only if you're an investor. You're going to rebuild your home immediately, finance optimizations be damned.
Contrast that with New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Property owners had their buildings destroyed, so taxes went to zero (taxes based on the property value, not the land value). This incentivized property owners to wait and see if their neighbors would rebuild rather than take immediate action.