News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Mandelbrot Monk (1999) by hoseja on Saturday June 05, 2021 @12:25PM (#27406362)
I was extremely skeptical from the start, simply because it's fairly impossible to stumble on the Mandelbrot set by just messing about, it's a result of iterating a fairly arbitrary function on complex numbers and can't reasonably be generated by hand.
Re:The Mandelbrot Monk (1999) by orangecat on Saturday June 05, 2021 @01:11PM (#27406786)
You don't need the full theory of complex numbers. Start with a zero vector, then iterate doubling the angle, squaring the magnitude, and translating by the vector you're evaluating. It's not totally inconceivable that somebody could have come up with it by just messing around geometrically.

But yes, good instincts.

Re:The Mandelbrot Monk (1999) by hoseja on Saturday June 05, 2021 @01:52PM (#27407154)
Wow, thanks! Never heard the geometric explanation and it, as usual, is way more intuitive.
Re:The Mandelbrot Monk (1999) by rocqua on Saturday June 05, 2021 @07:12PM (#27409195)
Consider this formulation of complex numbers:

Unit is 2x2 identity matrix.

imaginary unit is the matrix

    -1 0
     0 1
It is easy to check that imaginary unit squared is -1. And addition and multiplication is just matrices.

It then quickly becomes apparent that all possible matrices you generate _are_ the rotation and scaling matrices. Instead of drawing a connection between rotation and complex numbers, they all of a sudden are the same thing.

Re:The Mandelbrot Monk (1999) by tpoacher on Sunday June 06, 2021 @02:05PM (#27414959)
surely it should be:

    0 -1
    1  0
instead?
Re:The Mandelbrot Monk (1999) by rocqua on Monday June 07, 2021 @05:50AM (#27420732)
Wholly correct, sadly I cannot edit anymore :(