Re:Unix Shell Programming: The Next 50 Years [pdf]
by dTal on Friday June 04, 2021 @09:15AM
(#27393281)
>You are right it has some warts, but if a file is really that absolutely critical I make a .bak copy of it before I start my work
This seems to miss the point completely, unless you back up your entire hard disk before running every command. The whole problem is it's easy to nuke things you weren't intending to touch, accidentally.
The user-hostility of the shell is not a required feature to achieve its power. All of the advantages you cite could be had without being a terrible footgun with human factors mired in 1970s computing culture.
Re:Unix Shell Programming: The Next 50 Years [pdf]
by unrealhoang on Friday June 04, 2021 @10:59AM
(#27394250)
How is any of the advantages you listed not achievable by learning a better programming language, say, Python?
Re:Unix Shell Programming: The Next 50 Years [pdf]
by NegativeLatency on Friday June 04, 2021 @11:40AM
(#27394727)
Some of them are but for quick stuff itβs hard to match the speed and flexibility of the shell
You are right it has some warts, but if a file is really that absolutely critical I make a .bak copy of it before I start my work. The shell has its limitations but so do all tools and the power it gives me is unmatched.
As for other popular software there is plenty out there but other popular software out there destroys something far more valuable to me. My time.