Re:Massachusetts Steamship Authority hit by ransomware attac...
by COGlory on Wednesday June 02, 2021 @03:22PM
(#27372858)
Unless they were globally banned, companies could secretly and illegally pay ransoms in them anyways.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Massachusetts Steamship Authority hit by ransomware attac...
by ghaff on Wednesday June 02, 2021 @03:38PM
(#27373052)
They possibly could but a lot of executives would probably prefer that their soon to be ex-company took a hit than that they became personally liable for breaking a federal law.
Re:Massachusetts Steamship Authority hit by ransomware attac...
by sokoloff on Wednesday June 02, 2021 @03:55PM
(#27373283)
“We purchased security consulting services who were able to decrypt our ransomware-infected files. We’re not sure of the exact method they used but it worked.”
Re:Massachusetts Steamship Authority hit by ransomware attac...
by ncallaway on Wednesday June 02, 2021 @06:46PM
(#27374965)
Lawmakers have dealt with this problem for a long time. It’s well solved.
If they wanted to prevent this kind of behavior there are two straightforward approaches:
- make it also illegal for the consulting company to pay a ransom.
- attach Strict Liability to any ransom payment, even if made through an intermediary. The executives quoted above from the paying company could still face criminal liability for such a payment disguised with plausible deniability https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_liability