For Instance, I have been treating covid like an airborne pathogen since the /first/ time the CDC didn't recommend masking, based upon an epidemiologists take on early cruise ship data.
Of course I risked being wrong the whole time, but the cost of my leisure and convenience and income turned out to be worthwhile.
These organizations have burned through a tremendous amount of credibility by virtue of not being honest about what they did and didn't know. And Joe Sixpack, on the other hand, gained a lot. What are they going to be able to do when he starts using that to peddle dangerous products or make even worse recommendations but now with so much more influence?
There's no fastest way to erode the usefulness of a government than making negligent use of its credibility.
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/19/6/13-0192_article
Sure.
> You can't just have Joe Sixpack decided to not quarantine himself or not wear masks.
So, cooperation, via coercion? Got it. I guess the ends justify the means.
Yes, the authority figures can be wrong. Fauci can be wrong. People can die when health authorities make mistakes, whether through indecision or decision. I myself keep wearing masks after the CDC says I don't need to. I suspect historians are going to analyze the pandemic and list a litany of mistakes health authorities made in trying to stop the pandemic.
At the end of the day, who are you going to trust more? That schmuck in a random youtube video, or the doctors that run the CDC?