Re:Google made it nearly impossible for users to keep their ...
by croes on Saturday May 29, 2021 @10:41AM
(#27325545)
Because most users do not know what consequences their data can have.
The whole business is completely opaque.
A few years ago, it turned out that Apple users were shown higher prices in online shops just because they had used an Apple browser.
I doubt they were happy about it, but as long as they didn't know, they had seen no problem in sharing this information.
Re:Google made it nearly impossible for users to keep their ...
by nojito on Saturday May 29, 2021 @10:23AM
(#27325427)
>I see no evidence that regular people are particularly unhappy with sharing their information.
There's actually a pretty cool graph from Google from the court docs that says the opposite.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E2f1tSEWYAAVHGY?format=jpg&name=...
Re:Google made it nearly impossible for users to keep their ...
by joshuamorton on Saturday May 29, 2021 @11:05AM
(#27325704)
That graph didn't have a scale. It could be that 97% of users disabled the feature, or less than 1%. You just don't know.
Re:Google made it nearly impossible for users to keep their ...
by nojito on Saturday May 29, 2021 @11:17AM
(#27325783)
If the scale didn't matter, Google would not have called it a "Problem"
Re:Google made it nearly impossible for users to keep their ...
by joshuamorton on Saturday May 29, 2021 @11:23AM
(#27325821)
I think what it comes down to is that a small number of people coughs be "a problem", while still not being evidence that the median regular person or whatever cares.
Re:Google made it nearly impossible for users to keep their ...
by anoncake on Saturday May 29, 2021 @02:25PM
(#27327189)
> I see no evidence that regular people are particularly unhappy with sharing their information.
Then why trick Google and Facebook them into doing that instead of making it opt-in?
Re:Google made it nearly impossible for users to keep their ...
by JCM9 on Saturday May 29, 2021 @10:30AM
(#27325479)
A key point if the article is that consumer sentiment is shifting, Google knows it, and isn’t happy about that.
I see no evidence that regular people are particularly unhappy with sharing their information. While it's true that on the internet there's a loud privacy activist movement that's grown over the past few years, I don't think this movement reflects the true preferences of the silent majority. I think it's a self-serving moral panic.
Users benefit from the services that their information funds. It would be a mistake to incinerate trillions of dollars of institutional value on the say-so of a few strident and unrepresentative activist voices.