News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on It's virtually impossible to read old iMessages and they take up tons of storage. Parent comment

Re:It's virtually impossible to read old iMessages and they ... by JMTQp8lwXL on Friday May 28, 2021 @06:41PM (#27321377)
Seems like a humble choice for an executive to not take <firstname>@corp.com.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:It's virtually impossible to read old iMessages and they ... by eric_h on Friday May 28, 2021 @06:50PM (#27321442)
I was under the impression that Steve Jobs’ was [email protected]
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:It's virtually impossible to read old iMessages and they ... by alisonkisk on Friday May 28, 2021 @06:54PM (#27321467)
"steve" was a collision from the start.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:It's virtually impossible to read old iMessages and they ... by dkarras on Friday May 28, 2021 @07:29PM (#27321707)
I could imagine Steve Wozniak offering to use surnames only as a joke - because that wouldn't work either.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:It's virtually impossible to read old iMessages and they ... by lostlogin on Saturday May 29, 2021 @12:24AM (#27323013)
It would probably work better for the two Steves than it would for many others. According to the below random site, there 218 Jobs and 10,602 Wozniaks. It claims 410,801 Steves.

http://howmanyofme.com/search/

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:It's virtually impossible to read old iMessages and they ... by dkarras on Monday May 31, 2021 @06:38AM (#27342568)
Sorry my point was about [email protected] being the possible target of random job inquiries making the address unusable for Steve Jobs.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:It's virtually impossible to read old iMessages and they ... by lostlogin on Saturday May 29, 2021 @12:20AM (#27323004)
cook@apple is appealing somehow.
[ Parent | on HN ]