https://covid19criticalcare.com/videos-and-press/flccc-relea...
And in video form here:
That's not censorship.
Just found this overview by NIH on why they don't recommend treament. https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/antiviral-the...
Pretty detailed overview of why they are not convinced. Are they wrong? Maybe, but they're not censoring anything in my books.
What do they recommend? Wait until you're sick enough to go to hospital. This a year in a half into the pandemic, and you don't see the problem?
Compare this to the treatment protocol of the FLCCC
https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-pl...
> Maybe, but they're not censoring anything in my books.
I'd estimate about 90% of social media posts about Ivermectin get censored on social media.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/youtube-cancels-the-u-s-senate-...
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/feb/16/craig...
They literally have policies saying if you're posting anything about Ivermectin, it's misinformation, and it will get removed. How is that not censorship?
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785
Just now the Ivermectin Global Summit has been removed from YouTube. A medical conference gets removed and you claim that there's no censorship?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGefHqcnmio
You probably won't believe the censorship until you'll experience it first hand.
https://ivmmeta.com links to all sorts of studies published on the effectiveness of ivwhatever, all as support for using it.
It sounds more like the rest of the research/medical community is just not convinced.