News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The media's lab leak fiasco by shaicoleman on Saturday May 29, 2021 @02:06AM (#27323380)
> Just found this overview by NIH on why they don't recommend treatment.

What do they recommend? Wait until you're sick enough to go to hospital. This a year in a half into the pandemic, and you don't see the problem?

Compare this to the treatment protocol of the FLCCC

https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-pl...

> Maybe, but they're not censoring anything in my books.

I'd estimate about 90% of social media posts about Ivermectin get censored on social media.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/youtube-cancels-the-u-s-senate-...

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/feb/16/craig...

They literally have policies saying if you're posting anything about Ivermectin, it's misinformation, and it will get removed. How is that not censorship?

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785

Just now the Ivermectin Global Summit has been removed from YouTube. A medical conference gets removed and you claim that there's no censorship?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGefHqcnmio

You probably won't believe the censorship until you'll experience it first hand.

Re:The media's lab leak fiasco by admax88q on Monday May 31, 2021 @12:35AM (#27340177)
You started by claiming

> Part of the problem that there is censorship on publishing in the big journals.

and so far your evidence is censorship by youtube and facebook.